Case 6.3 Leonard v. PepsiCo, Inc., 210 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2000) The cases are assigned based on what team you are in so that case

Case 6.3 Leonard v. PepsiCo, Inc., 210 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2000)

The cases are assigned based on what team you are in so that cases are distributed evenly. Each student will treat this as an individual assignment (you do not need to meet with your team). Your response should be well rounded and analytical and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. 

The assignment should be submitted as a PowerPoint and should include the following slides (some questions may take more than 1 slide):

·
Parties   [Identify the plaintiff and the defendant]

·
Facts  [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case]

·
Procedure  [What was the outcome in the lower court(s)? Who brought the appeal?]

·
Issue  [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns]

·
Explain the applicable law(s). Do some research on the laws cited in the case.

·
Holding  [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?]

·
Reasoning  [Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision]

·
Legal Research [Report something you have discovered about the case, parties, or other important elements from your own research]

·
Conclusion [Summarize the key aspects of the decision and your recommendations on the court’s ruling]

·
References [Use APA style for your citations and references]

Research the case – HeinOnline, FindLaw.com, and other legal sources. Research the parties and circumstances of the case itself. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Course Project Progress Monitoring: Return to MobileGo The MobileGo project is making progress implementing the new systems. However, the software upgrades

Course Project Progress Monitoring: Return to MobileGo The MobileGo project is making progress implementing the new systems. However, the software upgrades and the new software installation are not complete. The project sponsor has requested an update on the project. Using the MobileGo Earned Value scenario spreadsheet, as an example, you will

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi Electronic University College of Administrative and Financial Sciences Assignment 1 Decision Making and Problem Solving (MGT 312) Due Date: (End of Week 6) 05-10-2024 Course Name: Decision Making and Problem Student’s Name: Solving